I lowered my fitness age to 35! That’s five years younger than my actual age. In theory, that means I have the fitness level of a 35-year-old—I’ll take it!
Since I’ve been home, I’ve been working out more frequently and incorporating more strength training into my routine. I even purchased a barbell and a workout bench. I’ve truly become a hybrid athlete—I run, cycle, skate, and lift weights. I also aim to get seven hours of sleep, 7,500+ steps daily, and limit processed foods. I don’t drink alcohol or soda, but I still enjoy ice and cookies on occasion.
I guess my training is actually improving my fitness. But is it really lowering my fitness age? The metrics are based on age, sex, resting heart rate, body mass index (BMI) or body fat percentage, and activity history. I’d like to say yes. Is my fitness age really 35? Maybe—but I’d argue it’s lower than the average 40-year-old who isn’t as active. I hope to lower it even more with continued training, proper rest, and good nutrition.